DEAD MESSENGER

What’s the message?

Welcome to the Golden (Police) State!

Welcome to the Golden (Police) State!

by Dead Messenger Oct. 30, 2013

Was Andy Lopez murdered by gun control advocacy?

True, it was apparently an over-zealous-swat-team-member of the Sonoma county Sheriffs Department, That pulled the 9 mil. death dealing trigger, eight times! But that just proves my point; gun control Nazis won’t admit, guns don’t kill people, people and their politics kill people. How young will the next toy-gun-toting child be?

Advocates for gun control, in collusion with vote pandering legislators, never let a media spectacle and tragedy, involving firearms go to waste. The more the media sensationalizes such a rare and isolated occurrence, somewhere in the world, the more they cry for legislation to prevent millions upon millions of safe, responsible and legal gun owners from possessing firearms.

Rock stars, teachers, students, congresswoman, federal judges, soldiers, presidents, their staff, people from every walk of life have been maimed or murdered by individuals with radicalized ideology or unstable antisocial mental disorders. its true, in recent events, semi-automatic rifles, that look scary, were used by them to commit mass carnage.

However, individuals intent on committing homicide could have used a Timothy McVeigh van=bomb, 911 domestic aircraft missiles, anthrax letters, sarin gas, Boston-Marathon-backpack-bombs, SUVs, fires or a cave man’s club. Point being, if some nut wants to “off” some people for whatever crazy reason, they don’t need a gun; they will find other alternatives; no matter how many laws are passed. Laws don’t stop homicidal maniacs from getting guns, if they so choose.

Gun control advocacy isn’t based on today’s facts and efficacy. “Controllers” would rather spend taxpayer time and money going after rights and arms than identify, treat and apprehend real criminals and prospective homicidal agents of death. it’s easier to pursue politics that threatens the safety, defense and rights of law abiding citizens. Why? Just so they can proclaim they’re protecting their kids and feel better about an issue to which they have no real solutions.

Imagine a nineteenth century sheriff and the townspeople of a wild west city; maybe right here in California. rifles and handguns were a normal and necessary way of daily life. Men, women, even young thirteen year old boys (often younger) were proficient, safe gun owners.

Townsmen openly carry their holstered handguns and rifles (real ones) and no one (even the sheriff) thought of them as an immediate threat, criminal or politically incorrect. In those days it was peaceable and permitted to speak your opinions. If necessary everyone had a right to protect one’s self, family and property from thieves and attackers.

Back then, everyone understood, they had a right and responsibility when exercising their constitutional rights to keep and bear arms. As a result, people graduated to more tolerant, respectful and civilized behavior toward one another, including the man with the badge. Each citizen knew the mortal cost for being too hasty in their intolerance or malintent toward others, with fire power equal to their own.

As history demonstrated, townsfolk became habituated to civil, helpful and kind conduct toward one another. They often voluntarily “hung their guns up” as gentlemen do, while in town or the saloon. It helped the sheriff keep the peace; being civil. But there was never any question, from the sheriff,; they could put them on just as well as hang them up.

In so many stories about the old west, a law man was respected by the community. Usually, because he was wise and judicious in his interaction with the folk, such a man was someone young boys and grown men could look up to. They lived in, served and protected the community. Granted, it was a simpler way of life, then. But, no matter how complex our society has become, “the sheriff” has an obligation to serve and protect the community. And, our rights have not changed (nor should they) because, someone doesn’t agree with the law of the land; the US Constitution.

The fact is gun violence and crime statistics are trending down; not up. This is especially true in states where open carry and concealed carry handguns have been licensed and legal. Also, firearm injuries either violent, self-inflicted or accidental, occur more often with hand guns than with rifles, so, just because a particular rifle looks “scary” doesn’t make it the problem.

Ultimately gun control advocates would like to repeal your second amendment rights described in the US Constitution. They’d rather sacrifice every citizen’s right and duty to protect this country from an out of control tyrannical government or despot, by making it a crime, and us criminals, for owning a firearm.

The real message from the murder of young Andy, innocently carrying a toy gun replica, alone, not threatening anyone in any way, is, if you even think of owning a gun, play with a toy gun, own guns, you are on the wrong side of society, popular politically correct politics and the law!

In fact, Gov. Jerry Brown of California, within the last couple of weeks, signed approximately seven out of eleven new gun control bills into law. California is the leading gun control state have to ask, has the gun control lobby and politics resorted to thought control? “The controllers” have a “I-want-to-feel-good-and-do-something-about-gun-violence-right-now” lynch-mob mentality. Their often fact-less, parroting, nanny brigades have inspired and conditioned the liked of the Sonoma county Sheriff Deputy, to roll-up, draw down and begin rapidly firing his side arm ammunition into poor Andy.

Andy, like young boys in the old west, was probably interested and fascinated with firearms. Perhaps Andy would be alive today, had the deputy not been politically conditioned to believe, against our right to have and carry a rifle, real or replica, without penalty of death.

If the twenty-first century sheriff hadn’t been so cowardly quick to draw on innocent Andy the encounter between a man and a boy, could have been just like the good old days; inspiring respect for law and community. Shooting first and asking questions later is only “good” police policy for a police state. Is that what “the controllers” want?

No doubt, the trigger happy deputy will most likely be scapegoated, and perhaps tried for his crime. “The department” will sympathize and placate the family and community, but we should call it what it is, out of control gun control.

When six and  ten year old boys are being punished by their teachers and policies prohibiting them from pointing their fingers in a “hand-gun parody” and mouthing “BANG!” at another classmate, you know the “nanny state politics has taken control. They won’t be satisfied until people with even the thought of owning or possessing arms of any kind, become a target of the law.

Dead Messenger

 

 

Advertisements

July 26, 2014 Posted by | America, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Msg. Feb 12, 2007; “Wake Up America!”

I just caluclated the money the U.S. has spent on the war in Afghanistan and Iraq could have funded over five and one half million four year college degrees. American security certainly is not free.

Iraq? Iran? Middle East Peace? Oil? Radical Islam? North Korea? What do we do now? That, is the question! Personally, instead of asking the American people to foot the bill, I think we should fire Condoleeza Rice, and find someone to start conducting an aggressive, effective, and massive diplomatic effort directed at the region and the world at large. An effort demonstrating why they are just as vulnerable to Islamic Fascism, and are ultimately co-responsible for securing Iraqi unity and peace; they should be helping the U.S. stabilize Iraq and protect the citizenry.

The world community should all be committing their troops and treasure as well; in order to muster an overwhelming force; The Powell Doctrine. Much like they do when cooperating on relief efforts to help other countries subsequent to natural disasters.

 Having deployed the unilateral Bush doctrine we have allowed the world community to become so utterly dysfuntional; to stand around and play like they’re  spectators while their house is burning down. This is the mistake that needs to be corrected.

It won’t just be the U.S. who suffers if the Iranians succeed in destablizing the entire middle east.

Its easier to criticize and pass non-binding resolutions than cooperate and build a reasoned concensus that demonstrates a unified front against the enemy. “I told you so,” isn’t constructive. Using the war effort to discredit the present administration for political gain and pleasure is at the very least, despicable.

WE ARE AT WAR! WAKE UP WORLD! WE ARE ALL AT WAR with a deadly enemy and  jihadist ideology that would like nothing better than to use the heart of the middle east for their terror platform. Estimates of global radical Islamist are approaching three-hundred million. Its time for the U.N. to step up and work for what it was empowered to do; promote peace, unity, and mutually assured survival against rogue nations and idealogues. It was not chartered to orchestrate the destruction and disassembly of the U.S.A.

WAKE UP AMERICA! WAKE UP AND SEE THE FACE OF YOUR ENEMY! They are here, now! We should not encourage them and give them hope, just because they hate George Bush. They hate us all.

February 13, 2007 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Msg. Jan. 18, 2006; “To Surge or Insurge? That is the question!”

Surge 20,000 or 100,000 troops? I say, no “out-posting,” no “street patrols” for American soldiers. Our only job should be, is to garrison our troops and suppress any gathering or consolidated attack formations presented by opponents and enemies of the elected Iraqi government.  

Let the Iraqis slog it out or reconcile, and stop blaming us for their own ignorance and errors of judgment. We should just sit in our air conditioned Iraqi garrisons (The Green Zone) and hold our strategic beachhead in the war on middle east Fascist Islam and the evil Imperialists in Iran. We should use such a strategic and secure position in Iraq to gather good solid middle east inteligence and conduct special forces clandestine raids to harass and injure our enemy.  Such a posture would, I believe, allow us time to prepare here at home to hear and fashion the “bipartisan” and international plan for victory; a unified movement forward against Islamic Fascisim. 

In the mean time, we can wait for the day when the fledgling Iraqi government (Al Malarki) can, if ever, exercise their “sovereignty” over the sectarian militias, terrorists, proxy fighters, and regional interventionist. Then, maybe, we’ll listen to their blustery edicts to the U.S.A. about what we can and cannot do in their country. We may as well use their lands to our advantage; we’ve certainly paid for the privilege. We did after all conquer them, twice!  

I’ll take a stalemate in advancing a democratic regime in Iraq. It would be nice to see it succeed but it may not and it isn’t from a lack of our effort. It was worth a try. “You can lead a horse to water…” 

The most devastating thing we could do is engineer cars that run on electricity. We should concentrate on sucking the blood of the snake dry (interrupt the flow of dollars funding their power and projection of power; petrol wealth) as opposed to attempting to chop its head off. In the American desert of thought on this subject I can’t think of a better source of metaphoric nourishing protein to fuel our survival. PUN intended….

January 19, 2007 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Msg. Nov. 13, 2006; China Our Friend or Foe?

The Washington Times reported a Chinese submarine stalking the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Kittyhawk and other vessels of the U.S. fleet,  undetected in the pacific ocean at the end of last month. That shouldn’t come as any surprise, should it? Especially after the revelations published in 1999 in The Cox Report,  issued by the select U.S. Congressional Committee. The report, summarized an investigation into Chinese espionage and how the PRC stole U.S. national security secrets and nuclear weapons technology here in the U.S. over several decades.  It was possibly the worst breach of national security in U.S. history. The report reveals that the cumulative effect of the national security breach has resulted in the proliferation of secret U.S. weapons technology to other countries.  In my opinion, The Cox Report just further emphasizes the danger and prevelance of federal government incompetence, lack of accountability, corporate treason, and poor, if any, congressional oversight.

AP filed a report in Forbes,  that within days of the surfacing naval embarrasment,  a high ranking Chinese military delegation was hosted by U.S. Pacific Fleet Commanders on a ” …tour of the USS Preble in San Diego and observed a demonstration of an amphibious assault vehicle and weapons simulation training at Camp Pendleton…” AP also reported, Admiral Gary Roughead, Commander of U.S. Pacific Fleet, is meeting today with PRC military officers in Beijing, China. ABCNews reporter Audra Ang reports Admiral Roughead stated, “The thrust of our discussions will really be in how our navies can gain a better understanding of one another.”   In light of these reports and previous Chinese espionage, what is more scary, that the PRC is tracking our vessels, undetected, with submarines or the fact that our top Naval Brass is happily “showing” them around American vessels, war technology, and active duty military personnell?

China sub stalked U.S. fleet

U.S. Pacific Fleet Commander Tours China

Chinese Officers to Tour U.S. Bases

A Breach of Security? The Cox Report-PBS Coverage

China Shakes the World: A Titan’s Rise and Troubled Future — and the Challenge for America
 
by James Kynge

                        See video introduction: Click Here

November 14, 2006 Posted by | America, Uncategorized | 1 Comment