DEAD MESSENGER

What’s the message?

Welcome to the Golden (Police) State!

Welcome to the Golden (Police) State!

by Dead Messenger Oct. 30, 2013

Was Andy Lopez murdered by gun control advocacy?

True, it was apparently an over-zealous-swat-team-member of the Sonoma county Sheriffs Department, That pulled the 9 mil. death dealing trigger, eight times! But that just proves my point; gun control Nazis won’t admit, guns don’t kill people, people and their politics kill people. How young will the next toy-gun-toting child be?

Advocates for gun control, in collusion with vote pandering legislators, never let a media spectacle and tragedy, involving firearms go to waste. The more the media sensationalizes such a rare and isolated occurrence, somewhere in the world, the more they cry for legislation to prevent millions upon millions of safe, responsible and legal gun owners from possessing firearms.

Rock stars, teachers, students, congresswoman, federal judges, soldiers, presidents, their staff, people from every walk of life have been maimed or murdered by individuals with radicalized ideology or unstable antisocial mental disorders. its true, in recent events, semi-automatic rifles, that look scary, were used by them to commit mass carnage.

However, individuals intent on committing homicide could have used a Timothy McVeigh van=bomb, 911 domestic aircraft missiles, anthrax letters, sarin gas, Boston-Marathon-backpack-bombs, SUVs, fires or a cave man’s club. Point being, if some nut wants to “off” some people for whatever crazy reason, they don’t need a gun; they will find other alternatives; no matter how many laws are passed. Laws don’t stop homicidal maniacs from getting guns, if they so choose.

Gun control advocacy isn’t based on today’s facts and efficacy. “Controllers” would rather spend taxpayer time and money going after rights and arms than identify, treat and apprehend real criminals and prospective homicidal agents of death. it’s easier to pursue politics that threatens the safety, defense and rights of law abiding citizens. Why? Just so they can proclaim they’re protecting their kids and feel better about an issue to which they have no real solutions.

Imagine a nineteenth century sheriff and the townspeople of a wild west city; maybe right here in California. rifles and handguns were a normal and necessary way of daily life. Men, women, even young thirteen year old boys (often younger) were proficient, safe gun owners.

Townsmen openly carry their holstered handguns and rifles (real ones) and no one (even the sheriff) thought of them as an immediate threat, criminal or politically incorrect. In those days it was peaceable and permitted to speak your opinions. If necessary everyone had a right to protect one’s self, family and property from thieves and attackers.

Back then, everyone understood, they had a right and responsibility when exercising their constitutional rights to keep and bear arms. As a result, people graduated to more tolerant, respectful and civilized behavior toward one another, including the man with the badge. Each citizen knew the mortal cost for being too hasty in their intolerance or malintent toward others, with fire power equal to their own.

As history demonstrated, townsfolk became habituated to civil, helpful and kind conduct toward one another. They often voluntarily “hung their guns up” as gentlemen do, while in town or the saloon. It helped the sheriff keep the peace; being civil. But there was never any question, from the sheriff,; they could put them on just as well as hang them up.

In so many stories about the old west, a law man was respected by the community. Usually, because he was wise and judicious in his interaction with the folk, such a man was someone young boys and grown men could look up to. They lived in, served and protected the community. Granted, it was a simpler way of life, then. But, no matter how complex our society has become, “the sheriff” has an obligation to serve and protect the community. And, our rights have not changed (nor should they) because, someone doesn’t agree with the law of the land; the US Constitution.

The fact is gun violence and crime statistics are trending down; not up. This is especially true in states where open carry and concealed carry handguns have been licensed and legal. Also, firearm injuries either violent, self-inflicted or accidental, occur more often with hand guns than with rifles, so, just because a particular rifle looks “scary” doesn’t make it the problem.

Ultimately gun control advocates would like to repeal your second amendment rights described in the US Constitution. They’d rather sacrifice every citizen’s right and duty to protect this country from an out of control tyrannical government or despot, by making it a crime, and us criminals, for owning a firearm.

The real message from the murder of young Andy, innocently carrying a toy gun replica, alone, not threatening anyone in any way, is, if you even think of owning a gun, play with a toy gun, own guns, you are on the wrong side of society, popular politically correct politics and the law!

In fact, Gov. Jerry Brown of California, within the last couple of weeks, signed approximately seven out of eleven new gun control bills into law. California is the leading gun control state have to ask, has the gun control lobby and politics resorted to thought control? “The controllers” have a “I-want-to-feel-good-and-do-something-about-gun-violence-right-now” lynch-mob mentality. Their often fact-less, parroting, nanny brigades have inspired and conditioned the liked of the Sonoma county Sheriff Deputy, to roll-up, draw down and begin rapidly firing his side arm ammunition into poor Andy.

Andy, like young boys in the old west, was probably interested and fascinated with firearms. Perhaps Andy would be alive today, had the deputy not been politically conditioned to believe, against our right to have and carry a rifle, real or replica, without penalty of death.

If the twenty-first century sheriff hadn’t been so cowardly quick to draw on innocent Andy the encounter between a man and a boy, could have been just like the good old days; inspiring respect for law and community. Shooting first and asking questions later is only “good” police policy for a police state. Is that what “the controllers” want?

No doubt, the trigger happy deputy will most likely be scapegoated, and perhaps tried for his crime. “The department” will sympathize and placate the family and community, but we should call it what it is, out of control gun control.

When six and  ten year old boys are being punished by their teachers and policies prohibiting them from pointing their fingers in a “hand-gun parody” and mouthing “BANG!” at another classmate, you know the “nanny state politics has taken control. They won’t be satisfied until people with even the thought of owning or possessing arms of any kind, become a target of the law.

Dead Messenger

 

 

Advertisements

July 26, 2014 Posted by | America, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Msg. Jan. 4, 2011; “What would Jesus do?” Throw The Money Changers Out!

 

James Madison

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by  controlling money and its issuance.” –James Madison

“Famous Quotations On Banking”

From:  www.TheMoneyMasters.com

US National Debt Clock; Real Time

Obama aide: Debt limit fight could be “catastrophic”

By Caren Bohan  WASHINGTON | Mon Jan 3, 2011 4:45am EST

“…Without a vote by Congress to raise the limit on government borrowing, the Treasury Department could bump up against the current $14.3 trillion debt limit. Treasury has estimated the limit could be reached during the first or second quarter of this year…”

In her article (linked above) Caren Bohan led  me to question why is our congress presently contemplating raising the national debt ceiling, again? Isn’t it time we, the American People, wake up to the fact that our nation is broke; that our government has already enslaved us to an insurmountable debt, owed to a private international banking cartel? A debt,   that even our grand children could never pay? Why would I want to borrow even more money?

I,  and many others, believe it is our duty and obligation to future generations, to reveal the truth and failure of the US Government to accept its constitutional obligation to operate and regulate  a monetary system  for the benefit of the American People. We need a law  governing a monetary policy that isn’t subject to the wild contrived fluctuations of the “business cycle.” A cycle, that is all too  often detrimental to middle class Americans and small businesses. For almost ninety years now, the American People and their government have  slowly and insidiously become enslaved by the devious self serving manipulation of the “Money Changers!” Now is the time to  chop off the head of that viscious hydra (Federal Reserve Bank), so that once and for all we may rid ourselves of such inequity and deception.

If you have time, I highly recommend you view the video documetary (below) “History of the Federal Reserve.” I believe this video is one of the most important revelations in generations regarding the global, domestic and economic dangers facing all Americans today. Many Americans, including this blogger, are asking themselves questions such as, “why does everything appear to be so upside down in this country?  Why can’t our congressional leaders and representatives control our catastrophic national spending and debt?” How did we get here; where did we go wrong? Why our we losing so many rights? Why does support for  socialism appear to be on the rise?” For many of the answers to these questions and many more, watch the video. The journalists inform us that maybe “one in a thousand people” truly understand our current monetary system.  And, as a result, most of our congressional and executive leaders don’t have a clue and are perplexed as to the true genesis and solution to our monetary system.   Its time, help us,  throw the money changers out!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7757684583209015812&hl=en#

Want to learn more about solutions to our economic demise? Visit The Money Masters and review “The Two Step Plan to Economic Reform & Recovery.”

“Monetary Reform Act – A Summary
(in four paragraphs)

This proposed law would require banks to increase their reserves on deposits from the current 10%, to 100%, over a one-year period. This would abolish fractional reserve banking (i.e., money creation by private banks) which depends upon fractional (i.e., partial) reserve lending. To provide the funds for this reserve increase, the US Treasury Department would be authorized to issue new United States Notes (and/or US Note accounts) sufficient in quantity to pay off the entire national debt (and replace all Federal Reserve Notes).

The funds required to pay off the national debt are always closely equivalent to the amount of money the banks have created by engaging in fractional lending because the Fed creates 10% of the money the government needs to finance deficit spending (and uses that newly created money to buy US bonds on the open market), then the banks create the other 90% as loans (as is explained on our FAQ page). Thus the national debt closely tracks the combined total of US Treasury debt held by the Fed (10%) and the amount of money created by private banks (90%).

Because this two-part action (increasing bank reserves to 100% and paying off the entire national debt) adds no net increase to the money supply (the two actions cancel each other in net effect on the money supply), it would cause neither inflation nor deflation, but would result in monetary stability and the end of the boom-bust pattern of US economic activity caused by our current, inherently unstable system.

Thus our entire national debt would be extinguished – thereby dramatically reducing or entirely eliminating the US budget deficit and the need for taxes to pay the $400+ billion interest per year on the national debt – and our economic system would be stabilized, while ending the terrible injustice of private banks being allowed to create over 90% of our money as loans on which they charge us interest. Wealth would cease to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands as a result of private bank money creation. Thereafter, apart from a regular 3% annual increase (roughly matching population growth), only Congress would have the power to authorize changes in the US money supply – for public use -not private banks increasing only private bankers’ wealth.”

2008 Presidential Candidate, Representative Ron Paul proposed abolition of the Federal Reserve in the 110th Congress 2007-2008

H.R. 2755: Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1Nejtzlq08

Ron Paul on Federal Reserve audit and financial regulation 6/30/2010 CSPAN



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hum7glP_QY0

Ron Paul Blasts Secret Government Running Economy


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AVJe2yIWIE&feature=related


SIGN THE PETITION TO ABOLISH THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK

January 4, 2011 Posted by | America | Leave a comment

Msg. Aug. 26, 2007; “CHINA, Inc.-The Dragon’s Fire”

A nation that has been transformed from sleeping to breathing fire in every direction. China is a country that is in the midst of its industiral revolution. It attracts captial and trade from around the world. The Assoicated Press reported last year that, America’s trade deficit is approaching one trillion dollars a year. How did this happen? Perhaps Peter Navarro can answer that as well as anyone.

It appears that Maoist China has attained their ferocious level of industrialisim, financial prowess, and growing military might with ruthless totalitarian capitalisim and not free trade policies. Their people certainly are not free; just ask Google who many now say “sold their soul to the devil himself.” China doesn’t play fair on the field of international and local commerce. How about the guy making pork dumplings with 60% card board…mmmmmm…tasty…and cheaper by the dozen too!

China’s CCTV had snuck a hidden camera into a place in Beijing where the meat buns were being produced, and discovered that 60% of the meat in their buns was actually cardboard! When mixed at such a ratio, it is very difficult for customers to realize that they are eating paper instead of meat. The folks caught making cardboard buns were shut down by the police, but this scandal could make Chinese consumers a bit worried about trusting meat buns. Other Chinese producers of meat buns, when asked to comment about this case, understandibly answered that they were very angry that someone would do such a disgraceful thing.

China figured out how to widen our trade deficit with them by pegging their Yuan to our Dollar, restricting access to their markets, governement subsidy of key industries, polluting the world, opressing and exploiting their laborer market, removing protections for intellectual property rights, sweet heart deals with foreign corporations, government sponsored systematic corporate and military espionage, you name it!

Now, they’re using their ill gotten gains to practice shooting down extraterrestrial satelites and shadowing Amrica’s pacific fleet with their new submarines (read my post Msg. Nov. 13, 2006; China Our Friend or Foe?). New toys!

Chinese foreign policy doesn’t really seem to be too concerned about North Korea’s Nuclear Mad Man either. I think they like to see America sweat while the finance our debt, wet our appetite for their cheap and often defective products. China threatens and exploits American economic destabilization in addition to military expansion and adventureism. All, while America continues to delude itself into thinking all is well. What’s the latest on Paris; not France, Hilton?

Dr. Navarro accurately characterized Americans, and I’m paraphrasing, near sighted and impatient in our trade policies. It seems America has become unwilling to do anything to protect our standard of living. What’s next?Get ready!

The Coming China Wars By Peter Navarro

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lj9OGCcYTJM]

Read more about Professor Navarro’s study of China, Inc. on his website:

www.PeterNavarro.com

August 26, 2007 Posted by | America | Leave a comment

Msg. April 11, 2007; “All Volunteer Army”

Volunteers Or Mercenaries?

By Joshua Rosenstock | April 11, 2007

“The struggle to entice Army soldiers and Marines to stay in the military, after four years of war in Iraq, has ballooned into a $1 billion campaign, with bonuses soaring nearly sixfold since 2003.” 

My Response to the above WashingtonHotList.com Blogger:

JR, why can’t we get the history “straight?” I know the left and right are screaming their sound bytes so loudly it’s hard to hear “The war” against Jihadists was on @ 911. Up until that time we just brushed it off as isolated crime.

So, what did we do, we recognized the enemy was not conventional and was sponsored and supported by the likes of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, Iraq, on and on. The President said, “You’re either with us or you are against us.” He made it clear, then, that the “war against terror,” and I don’t like that term, it’s a tactic not the enemy, would take decades to resolve. He said, it would be seen and unseen, conventional and unconventional tactical warfare. He expressed the need for a UNITED world community. He asked for world support and got a cold shoulder. I submit, that if the world community had stepped up to ITS RESPONSIBILITY, we wouldn’t be in this mess in the first place! Let’s put the BLAME where it belongs! How soon we forget. Bush spoke the truth. That was not a lie!

This 100 year war is not going away. Iraq is just one phase of that war unless of course we are prepared to surrender now. We can agree that Iraq has not gone the way we planned. I concede it was mismanaged. We made a mistake in our plan of attack. However, I disagree with those that say it was a premeditated mistake to decide to go there.

Firstly, attacking Iraq was a militarily strategic decision and it was meant to serve multitude of purposes. Warfare is a level of complexity most people don’t understand. I admit it. Especially when one is in the midst of battle.

One of the reasons,was to end the tyranny and WMD concealed threats by Sadam and his Republican
Guard. He was one of the stupidest military tacticians of all time. He bluffed until he was called, to the detriment of his entire nation. All he had to do, was comply with our demand for inspections. This is not all on Georgy’s head.

Another reason, to put some teeth into the dozens of toothless Useless Nations sanctions. All, while Sadam fired on our enforcement of the no fly zones to protect the Kurds and the Shiites (who have since turned on us after we liberated them from the death grip of the Suni tyrants). All, while the Security Council members were voting one way and double dealing the other.

Another reason, the military strategy to turn Iraq around and enlist her as an ally against Jihadists was theoretically a good one at the time, sociologically and geographically. If we had been more successful, do you doubt that all the politicians from both sides of the isle wouldn’t be crowing about the fact they did vote for the second invasion of Iraq. Now, everyone is running away from it.

In hind sight, it should be obvious, that our strategy was to put our decades old foe, Iran, in a cross fire; between two fronts, Iraq and Afghanistan. What we didn’t count on was our allies stabbing us in the back and our political parties here at home using the war effort as a club; to beat each other over the head, and prosecute our soldiers, for nominal “gains.”

Our congress has made a despicable showing of American resolve, even when we have every right to vanquish our enemies. They, our enemies, are using Iraq and the entire middle east to drain American resources and our resolve. They want to defeat and demoralize our population and civilization. While our opportunistic friends, China, Russia, and Western Europe exploit the situation rather than help us defeat a global threat. As I’ve said before, you’ll see the most terror in the eyes of those watching America, go into survival mode, and pull out of the geopolitics of the middle east. That will be holy terror for all who live in that region. Especially, those who are not Muslims.

Those MEN aren’t mercenaries, Sir. They are fighting your battles and doing your killing. Freedom is not free. As the freedom loving Spartans pledged, “Come home with your shield or on it.” The Secretary of Defense announed today that combat deployment will now be a fifteen month rotation. Otherwise, dwell time would have to be less that one year. Raising their very low pay, has nothing to do with volunteer vs. mercenary. Its just common decency, equity and respect. If we don’t take a stand now and there, when and where will we? Don’t you dare look down your nose at them; our men and women in uniform.

Maybe you prefer blood on your doorstep? What will you say then? What will you do? Are you married with children? Do you want to win the war against the radical Muslim Jihadists? Have you not heard what they say they want, and try to do, to do to our civilization? Shall we continue to bash Bush, appoint the 500 members of congress as Generals, and act like we know how to conduct military operations? Congress didn’t look so confident and smug on 9/11. Do we need another one to wake this country and this congress up? I guarantee you, when there is another attack, they’ll be the first one’s yelling, “…why didn’t you do anything to save us?! Get out there and fight, here’s a blank check!”

I suggest the fundamental error is that we have let the rest of the world off the hook because we are a “super power.” They’re happy to let us take their lumps for them. The whole idea of the U.N. was to prevent world wars by isolating and standing united against roughish nations with ambitions to become nuclear threats and a menace to the world community. Some neighborhood! The only thing we’ve gotten is a rogue’s gallery of corrupt diplomats who wallow in debauchery while their blue hats sit around and do nothing, except maybe rape the local women.

I think we need to step up the heat on the world community to either put up or shut up. And if they choose the latter, then, that is the last straw as far I’m concerned. And, the only mercy left should be that which God himself can give.

George is right about one other thing, for a change, the next president will still be fighting “The War” on Jihadist. Remember that when you go to the poles.

April 12, 2007 Posted by | America, Islamo Fascism | Leave a comment

Msg. Feb. 28, 2007; “A Defendant Nation!”

In response to WashingtonHotList.com blog: “An Independent Nation” Monday, February 26, 2007 by Alex Hammer

I pray that you are right about “…America is a great and strong country…” Mr. Hammer. Many others smell something quite different in the air. Perhaps we remain strong today, but what about tomorrow? Is America guaranteed a future merely because we have drawn lines on a map and brave men fought for her establishment.

Unfortunately, “THE” two party system has a “death grip” and “strangle hold” on this nation’s representative government and political process; they are not going to give that up easily, if at all. As a former independent candidate for governor, I’m certain, you could articualte the impedements to getting your name on the ballot?

So much of the public’s attention is being focused now on the presidential campaign. All the while, the congress and the executive branch is selling them out. As has been said before, “America has the best government money can buy.”

Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract with America by Newt Gingrich

I agree that we inherited a great country from previous generations. However, as Newt Gengrich (former speaker of the House) has said, and I paraphrase, “…future generations will have to win it… [win American prosperity and security].” We need more people like yourself to step forward take action and speak up for America. People who bilieve, as you said about America, “… it is (or should be) very easy to be grateful for the specialness of this country and what we really have…”

The strength of the American econonomy and security is under assault and is being weakened every day. I could give you many examples why I am not as optomistic as you are about the protection and integrity of our borders, language, culture, and standard of living.

Please, allow me, to focus on one of many insidious assaults on American National Soverignty. It was reported by Human Events : August 20 , 2006 — by Alan Caruba, ” The name of this effort is called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) and, guess what, it has not been submitted to the Senate for its oversight or concurrence because, by some magic of governmental definition, it is not a treaty. Instead, its administration is buried in the bowels of the Commerce Department…Like termites eating away at the sovereignty of the United States of America, this grandiose scheme, hatched in some darkened cavern of the Council on Foreign Affairs, is a major threat to American security and prosperity…” It is otherwise known as the “North American Union.”

The SPP initiative, I and many others submit, is what is contributing to our country’s “immigration schizaphrenia.” The same assault on soverignty that not only wants our borders wide open, our laws disregarded, but also a four football field wide freeway through the middle of our heartland from South America to Canada.

As you may know, America has an unchallanged, and welcomed by many, invasion of millions upon millions of multinational illegal aliens and drug smuggling crossing our soverign borders. In addition, I call your attention to the recent US Transportation Department’s announcement a few days ago that 100 Mexican trucking companies will be allowed onto American highways, as part of a year long pilot program. Those drivers and their trucks aren’t regulated for safety in Mexico and we don’t have the enforcement neccessary to regulate the safety of our own domestic trucking industry. The Dubai Ports debacle was nothing compared to this!

I could go on and on about the challanges and dire consequences facing America if our congress does not get their houses in order. Petty partisanship, political bikering, betrayal of the public trust, and do nothing incumbency with arcane committee rules, is killing this country.

Presently, it doesn’t appear to matter much who gets elected, democrat or republican; the results are the same.I consider myself an idependent. But until and unless, independents find a way to break open the intentional domination of the political process by “The” other two parties, I fear we won’t see the work and service of the American people getting done. And, our national soverignty will continue to erode.

Global corporations, with American charters, protection, and Commerce Department trade advocacy, have relocated their factories to Mexico to exploit their impoverished people’s labor, as well as the tax and environmental laws. Now they want to use thier business advantage to exploit America, the American worker, and our domestic seaports and  trucking industry.

If we hold this country dear, we need to be less distracted, as you said by the, “…difficulties found in many other places…” and focus more on our problems right here in America.

http://www.spp.gov/

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050323-1.html

Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America; Wikipedia

Another prominent “independent” Ross Perot was right when he said, “If you pass the NAFTA you will hear a large sucking sound of jobs flowing out of this country.”

I believe Ross had the right ideas, vision, and management models for reforming our govenment and how to get things done. I believe he came so close to acutally having a shot at winning the presidency he scared himself and backed out. If we really are serious about taking back our government with an independent party we should go back and study Mr. Perot’s campaign.

 Are our leaders  going to stand by and watch or help China  develop  multiple Mexican deepwater “superports”  with advanced cargo transfer technology such as the one in Punta Colonet, Mexico (150 miles south of Los Angeles, CA)?  Then, via the SPP agreement, allow free access to American land transport systems from Mexican  seaports? Thereby, decimating the American domestic manufacturing base and seaports. All, so China can become the “industry floor” of American global coproations and politicians i.e. Presidents George W. & H. Bush,  and Bill Clinton. 

China’s is progressively dominating  south American and other  major internaitonal trade and shipping lanes. Likewise, they are   increasingly gaining market share of American manufacturing demand. As China grows in power the US has become weaker strategically and economically.  What will happen to American “indpendence” should our governments find themselves at odds on trade and competition for natural resources? To whom will America turn should we find ourselves in mortal danger and in need to manufacturer military weaponry and naval vessels? China? Has America unwittingly sold itself out to become enslaved and a stepping stone, to world domination,  by Asia and the Middle East?

It’s clear to me that the world stage has become progressively more competitive. Nation states are beginning to find the globe a crowded home which requires their dependence upon all family members to maintain peace and equity. I pray the worlds nations will fairly and effectively transition from the age of global competition to cooperation.  A world that recognizes we are a community of “Interdependent Nations.” Nations that should all desire and work fairly and  sincerly together to avoid future epochs of  retogressive civilization, human catastrophe, holocaust,  and obsolete warfare.

CLICK HERE TO SEE AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR WINNING THE FUTURE

 

The 34th Annual CPAC

You are invited to watch Newt Gingrich’s closing address at the Conservative Political Action Conference from 3/3/2007 on demand.

February 28, 2007 Posted by | America, Immigration | Leave a comment

Msg. 2; Feb. 7, 2007; “Radical Islam; Terror In Its Own Words”

 

Fox News reporter E.D. Hill presented a Fox News Special expose last weekend titled, “Radical Islam; Terror In Its Own Words,” in colaboration with Brigitte Gabriel, journalist, author, “Because They Hate” and President of the American Congress for Truth. Yesterday, I received an email from Ms. Gabriel in which she states, she belives  the American publc needs a weekly show she has proposed called, “Middle East Media Watch.”

Brigitte stated;

“I will be interviewed on Hannity and Colmes tonight discussing the hate teachings of Islam against the infidels, Jews and Christians, to children and adults here and around the world. Tune in and tell your friends.

They will be showing clips of the Fox Special “Radical Islam, in their own words” which I had worked on with E.D. Hill. The special will be airing again this coming weekend for those of you who missed it.

Make sure you email Fox News and thank them for having the courage to show such videos and air such a documentary. Here is the email address: fncspecials@foxnews.com Ask them to create more programming on this issue.

I had presented Fox News with a TV show titled: “Middle East Media Watch” which I have been working on for two years. Fox thought that there might not be enough interest in the American public to watch such a program on a weekly basis. So they decided to do documentaries instead to test the pulse of interest. I believe there is so much material to wake up the American public and to debate the issues.

I believe someone like me who comes from a Middle Eastern background can debate the issues with the Islamic imams or any of their spokespersons, cutting through the political correctness because I come from the Middle East and no one can accuse me of being racist. I know so much detail about the Arabic culture that I will stop them in their tracks when they try to pull any games designed to derail any westerner. I can open up their Koran and quote it in Arabic, my first tongue, and they cannot run circles around me with the translation issue. I beleive we need to expose the Muslim double talk by the insincere talking heads making excuses for anything and everything.

You need to let Fox know that there is a great interest in seeing a weekly show like that. If you agree, here is what you can email them:

[SAMPLE EMAIL]

 

Thank you for having the courage to air the special about Radical Islam this last weekend. You have been a shining light in the media bringing the important issues to light in a way that no other news network has done.

We encourage you to air more programming like this. We even welcome a weekly program designed to monitor the Arabic media and debate those clips with the so called moderate Muslims in America. You can probably use someone like Brigitte Gabriel who was interviewed on your special and speaks the Arabic language as her first tongue to debate them. I strongly encourage you to give the American public more of those types of programs. We as Americans need to see the face of the enemy we are dealing with and how they are preparing the next generation to kill us, so we may prepare our next generation to defend the freedoms and values our founding father died to establish in our great country. 

May God bless you for your courage and bless our great country.

(your name)

The above is a sample letter. Please change it as much as you want and personalize it. “

Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America” by Brigitte Gabriel

February 7, 2007 Posted by | America, Immigration, Islamo Fascism | Leave a comment

Msg. Feb. 7, 2007; “Mr. Speaker!”

 

NEWT GINGRICH FOR PRESIDENT! 

It appears the only guy who hasn’t announced his candidacy for Presdident of the US is former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich. By far, in my opinion, Mr. Gingrich is the most qualified man for the job. His command of the English language, knowledge of history, practiacal experience with the workings of governement, vision and concern for a better America demonstrate he would be a superior choice of any declared Presidential candidate today. Newt is, QUALIFIED!!

Speaker Gingrich is indeed a national treasure and asset. If he should decide to apply to the American People for the office of President, he comes with a platform that has already been well developed in the interveneing years since he last served his country in public office. He has been very active in the public and academic forums; as a college professor, author, TV news political analyst, congressional advisor, and public speaker.

Newt’s perspective of the future challanges and dangers facing America is instructive and comprehensive. In his own words, in a recent speech (Nov. 2006; Post Election Speech to GOPAC, see video above.), Newt stated,  “…We are the most successful, the wealthiest, and the most powerful nation in history because for generations, our parents and grandparents have worked and fought to develop the county we inherited.  And the reason I entitle my book “Winning the Future” is I want to send a single message, which is we can win the future; we will not inherit it.  We’re going to compete with China and India economically.  We’re going to have to absorb an enormous explosion of scientific knowledge.  We have to meet the challenge of the Baby Boomers living longer than any generation in history.  We have to understand the challenge of a government which is increasingly obsolete and increasingly ineffective.  And we have to understand the genuine threats to our survival internationally from terrorist groups and we have to beat back the secular academic legal challenge to the very core of American values. 

Now all of those things have to be done simultaneously.  We’re not given the privilege of ordering our history to appear seriatim because we’d like to deal with one at a time.  We have to deal with all of them.  I believe we will be, in the next 20 years, more challenged than any generation since Abraham Lincoln in 1861.  Now if you have to go look back to the scale of the Civil War and the degree to which required fundamental change in order for the union to survive to have any sense of what’s coming at the U.S. in the next 20 years.  And I don’t think we’re ready for it.  We don’t have a political structure that can describe it, a new media that can cover it, a leadership that can offer the solutions, or a government that can implement it.  And this will be a very, very significant period of change.  And I think the challenge to the Republicans is to be the party that has the courage to confront that reality and to deal with that reality.  …”

The Speakers’  21st Century Contract With America outlines the challanges and issues that face America and the goals to address them.  He warns us that we “…will not inherit America…[we’ll have to win it]…” I for one appreciate his warning that citizens and our government leaders urgently need to focus more on important issues and meaningful changes and less on partisan political tactics to gain power.

If you’re interested in learning more about the perspectives of a truly great leader you may visit Newt’s website www.newt.org.

Speaker Gingrich’s  most recent books:

Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract with America by Newt Gingrich

Rediscovering God in America: Reflections on the Role of Faith in Our Nation’s History and Future by Newt Gingrich

February 7, 2007 Posted by | America | Leave a comment

Msg. Feb. 3, 2007; “Mess of Millennia”

 

 Web of Deceit 1990: Sure Saddam, take Kuwait; Barry Lando

US Complicity with Saddam’s ’91 slaughter. PART 1/2

US complicit as Saddam annihilates 91 uprising PART 2/2

Barry Lando Interview with the Colbert Report: 

I was watching a pre-recorded author’s book review on CSPAN today; Web of Deceit: The History of Western Complicity in Iraq, from Churchill to Kennedy to George W. Bush by Barry M. Lando. Mr. Lando is unabashedly a self admitted dissenter of the current American military involvement in Iraq. I value his perspective on the history of American and western Europe’s,  involvement in Iraqi national politics. His  report may give us an important understanding about how “we” got into this perpetual middle eastern millennial mess. 

The author’s review and question/answer period excited my memory of the days just before operation Iraqi Freedom. I remember a phone conversation with my Dad, ‘I’m not worried about winning a military battle with Saadam,… he has defied the U.N. and weapons inspection protocols, …he is a ruthless tyrant, …but what are we going to do after he is defeated…that’s what worries me…’ And so, my worst fears have come true. It’s on the lips of all the hand wringing and debating American congressmen, several whom want to conduct American foreign policy independent of the executive branch, “…[a very grim situation]…”

Historically, the Iraqi morass we find ourselves in isn’t totally the making of George Bush II. As Mr. Lando said, “… there’s plenty of blame to go around.”  What’s disturbing to me is, we appear to be  repeating the failed attempt by the British, French, Italians, and Russians,  in the  previous Millenia during the early 20th century; the Sykes-Picot Agreement. They exploited wealth and bilaterally strategized how they would dominate and control regions and governments in the middle east after the fall of the Ottoman empire.

Such  partitions include most notably the formation of Palestine, Israel,  and Iraq as well as Jordan, Turkey, Syria, and Lebanon and several others.  In view of recent and successive historical events, not much seems to have changed middle eastern anger and hatred toward western europe and subsequently America.

What enrages me is, I believe the U.S. has allowed the progenitors of the Iraqi/middle east mess, at great expense to us,  to “get off the hook;” an escape by western European nations and other members of the United Nations shirking their international responsibility. It is my opinion, prior to invading Iraq, we should have “held their feet to the fire” and insisted “they” (the United ones),  review their involvement and responsibility for middle east peace. U.S. foreign policy should have made it clear, that “they” must back up their numerous and repeated U.N. resolutions agains Iraq, with their troops and treasure also.

Concomitantly, U.S.  mistakes in the middle east, have unilaterally provided the strategic self distraction and economic drag our current, potential and former enemies could previously only have hoped for.  As long as the U.S. remains isolated by the world community as a unilateral actor, we’re a weaker force. Our enemies are emboldened to aggressively persue their  mischevious and evil international and geopolitical agenda in the form of proxy warriors and nuclear/conventional weaponization.

I think it was important for America to have insisted on multinational support before the war in Iraq, but, we failed to do that.  Although, late as it may be, I believe that is what is urgently needed today. The United Nations seems to have failed its purpose to unite the nations of the world in peace and the rule of law enforced against nuclear rogue nations and sponsors of terrorism i.e. North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Lybia, Syria, and so on. Short of that, we find our nation  forced to protect our vital national interest,  which is access to middle eastern oil. Additionally, we must defend our nation, and others, against fascist Islamist using Fabian Strategy in the U.S.  conflict with Iraq, at home,  and other global fronts.

 If the U.N. isn’t willing to do their part and the American Public refuses to support expeditionary conflicts against our enemies we are left with one option, in my opinion. That is,  withdraw and garrison America and allow the reluctant and irresponsible nations in the region to settle the social and economic mess for the remainder of this millennia.

Frankly, I have no problem with an American  laissez faire foreign policy. We have plenty of domestic policies that have been completely neglected by the distractions of Iraq, and other geopolitical  issues not being resolved by the regional actors who should be active and responsible for seeking their resolution.

 Of course, we will have to be willing to  stay out of real and potential military conflicts which threaten the future of western Europe, Africa, Asia, and many other parts of the world. Just like world war II, they’ll come neighborly knocking on America’s door asking for our assistance, treasure, and troops, to save them from the threats they refused to face. 

Having garrisoned our country, withdrawn all foreign aid dollars,  and avoided the cost of future military support, such a U.S.  laissez faire policy could afford our diplomats and political leaders the opportunity to be a passive global as well as the U.N.s most ardent critic. Similar to the frequent criticisim the U.S. receives from U. N. members and many quarters of the globe. That way we won’t have to suffer the likes of Senator John Kerry sticking another foot in his mouth claiming America is the pariah of the world.

As I have stated before, I think the best we could do for our vital national interest is persue a vigorus policy of energy independence within ten years. And, limit our global humanitarian contributions to improving our educational institutions and providing universal access of quality education to U. S. Citizens. Further, exporting our superior educational services in the  humanites,  life sciences, political science, and world history, to students traveling to the U.S. from other countries. Additionally, constraining our military to protection of our continent except for humanitarian aid to nations suffering natural disasters, which they can pay us back for after they recover.  As Michael Savage stated, “…protect our borders, langauge, culture…[and standard of living].”

Why should our domestic economy and future well being be dependent on unlimited growth and population of our nation? I doubt we can sustain it. It seems to me,  our political leadership, the common good of our nation, and domestic policy,  is divided. It appears to me to be divided,  by the constant corporate and government emphasis on expanding and exploiting international markets and labor,  coupled with unrestrained and unlimited growth here at home. When is enough, enough? How many billionaires can we afford? Answer, maybe we’ll know sometime in the  next millennia. Did I say Mellennia? How about the next decade? A time when, there is no middle class left in the U.S.A. ; only the rich and the poor. We’ll be just like those western European and third world nations many Americans admire  today,  yet whom  criticise us the most.

February 3, 2007 Posted by | America, Islamo Fascism | Leave a comment

Msg. Jan 29, 2007; “Liv’n In America…”

In the article Hezbollah, Illegal Immigration, and the Next 9/11 By LTC Joseph Myers and Patrick Poole FrontPageMagazine.com | April 28, 2006 the following quote from author and journalist Barbara Newman tells us:

 “…According to Tom Diaz and Barbara Newman, co-authors of the recently published book, Lightning Out of Lebanon: Hezbollah Terrorists on American Soil (Presidio Press, 2005), active Hezbollah cells have been identified in Boston, New York, Newark, Atlanta, Miami, Tampa, Charlotte, Louisville, Detroit, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Portland. Diaz and Newman quote former FBI Hezbollah unit director, Bob Clifford, as saying, “they are the best light infantry in the world and can strike the United States anytime, anywhere.”…”

January 30, 2007 Posted by | America, Islamo Fascism | Leave a comment

Msg. Jan. 1, 2007; “Living On A Thin Line”

I was listening to the radio talk show host Dr. Michael Savage earlier this month (December 13, 2006). He started his show with a song recorded in 1984, “Living on a Thin Line,” included in the album “Word of Mouth” written and performed by the British rock band, The Kinks. For your education and pleasure I recorded the rebroadcast of the show and added some video graphics and additional music. 

“Living on a Thin Line” was haunting, evocative, and pleasingly melodic. The lyrics mourn the end of England and lamented, “…there’s no England now…” and that somehow all the kings and wars and institutions that came before it were, in the end, all for nothing.   England is truly under siege by radical Islamic Fascists. To the most casual of observers, it’s clear; they oppose democracy and everything that the nations of England and  America have worked so hard to achieve.  Mark Steyn writes in his book, “America Alone: The End Of The World As We Know It” by Mark Steyn:

” Europe’s successor population is already in place and “the only question is how bloody the transfer of real estate will be.” He interprets the Madrid and London bombings, as well as the murder of Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam, as opening shots in Europe’s civil war and states, “Europe is the colony now.”

Michael also blended his radio personality commentary and calls from his listeners to make the show particularly interesting and alarming. His monologue was an acerbic and accurate indictment of the failure and irresponsibility of our government, corporate culture, educational institutions, mass media, and congress. He tells us he sees ample evidence of radical Islam infiltrating all sectors of our society to advance a destructive, oppressive, and violent agenda against the U.S.A. Myself and many of his callers frequently ask, where is the general public and congressional outrage, indignation, confidence, and desire to defeat Islamic  Fascism!? 

Dr. Savage believes radical Muslims are using the same legal and educational sophistries and dual loyalty deception they have been using in England to bully and cow the public and government into catering to Muslims with special laws and public assistance. He sighted organizations resident in the United States such as C.A.I.R. (Council on American Islamic Relations) as being agents for those goals and methods. An article link on his website by Andrew McCarthy, “Singing CAIRs Tune On Your Dime” of the National Review (online)is an excellent expose of their infiltration into the highest levels of our federal govenment; including President Bush, the FBI, and TSA.  C.A.I.R. is rightly portrayed in the video as antithetical to American national sovereignty and security. Middle east expert, Daniel Pipes, criticizes C.A.I.R.’s self portrayal as a “…civil liberties group…” for Muslims. He also chronicles their exploits and Islamic terrorist connections.

 Michael Savage like many other geo political scholars believes  England has lost the will and the struggle against Islamic Fascism. He and his radio broadcasting crew mixed samples of historical speeches given by the Nazi appeaser Neville Chamberlain and the inspiration of WW2 Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill. Their speeches remind us of the danger of attempting to appease an enemy intent on our destruction and what we must do to prevent it. Indeed, England was “…Living on a thin line…” in world war two. If it hadn’t been for American intervention, England and all of western Europe would have been lost long ago.  

Our enemy today is much different than the ones we faced in WW I I and afterwards. Islamic Fascists are clandestine and unconventional. They are exceedingly patient in gathering intelligence and executing their tactics. As in all war, deception is one of their fiercest weapons. Violent radical Muslims are well funded with twentieth century petrol-wealth and are using it to leverage prosecution of their multigenerational campaign against western Judeo-Christian infidels.

Islamic Fascist have, using modern communications and transportation systems, established forward basing of their ideology in order to indoctrinate the indigenous offspring of Muslim refugees and immigrants that have found their way into America, England,France, Belgium, Australia, and many other countries. Their birth rates are typically three to four times western average birth rates. In addition, they also work especially hard to recruit and appeal to the indigenous weak minded, disaffected, socially degenerate, and criminal elements of their enemy’s society. Violent Jihadist don’t marshal, train, and field an army using traditional methods, time, and materials.  They are literally and generationally assembling their armies in our midst! It appears such a plan isn’t limited to physical combat. It is much more insidious than that. Plans like that only require that they propagate their ideology and out populate their opponent in competition for the same territory. Jihad has always been multigenerational in its quest to establish, by force if necessary, Islam as the only world religion. And, if we read the Middle East Forum “Islamist Watch; The Threat of Legal Islamism,”  they do it under the camouflage of our own freedoms of press, religion, and privacy.

Armed with radical Islamic ideology they have achieved social and cultural infiltration, occupation, domination, and assembly of tactical domestic warrior communities in our heartlands. They are independent of the need for the importation of weaponry and logistical support. There are no physical supply lines to attack and disrupt; only a radical ideology. A good example would be the “No Go Zones” in Paris, France. There’s no more France now. The new term for what was once Western Europe, is labeled by Bat Ye’or, a historian,  “Eurabia,” in her book titled Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis” by Bat Ye’or.

Brigitte Gabriel, Author, T.V. News Journalist, and Middle East Expert, tells us, we should “…listen to the enemy.” Only problem with that is we don’t speak their language. They are telling us and showing us what they plan to do. When will America wake up and listen and see? We are at war, but America and Americans in general don’t seem to be engaged and involved. The war cry seems to be “We deserve defeat!” I for one don’t think so! 
 

 America was once a country of men that knew their fate if they refused to stand and protect what they had worked so hard for. They were men who were willing to sacrifice everything for freedom; theirs and ours. If they had not, this country would have been ruled by the
British Empire or some other tyrant and oppressors. Perhaps, Nazi Germany, the Union of Soviet SocialistRepublic, or Fascist Islamic Republic. There was and is no free ride. We must remember the lessons of the past and the terrible price paid. If not, we will continue to pay a heavy toll for the future. If our countrymen hadn’t been willing to pay, attention to history, and the price of freedom, American colonist would have been broken long ago. Those, MEN, weren’t afraid to say what was on their mind. 
Maybe a remembrance of the American revolutionary army’s decisive battle of Yorktown would inspire some to action? For others, George Washington pleading in the bitter cold of winter for the continental army to reenlist against all odds and fairness. We must reclaim our identity as Americans and be willing to assert, protect, and win our rights. Yes, our rights, as a nation and a people whose founding fathers predicated a living social economic culture and government on their knowledge of the righteous goal and loving gospel that was given to all of us by our prophets in the spirit of truth, “The Fatherhood of God and The Brotherhood of All Men.” 

 What’s left of this once great country? A citizenry of apathy and ignorance? A pop culture dominated by viscous Rapp songs, drug abuse, sexual addiction, criminal idolization, and lack of responsibility and respect for tradition, authority, and education. Have we become a social mass that knows no shame, expects only privilege, and believes the government is their “Mommy?” Indeed, a socialist dependent willing to settle for a government matriarch that doesn’t require their civic education and responsibility? A fantasy life? A fantasy, that we’ll always be free, protected, and a sovereign nation, even though our government is no longer accountable to The People?  

Have Americans become, in the words of Pink Floyd, “…comfortably numb…” and accustomed to a powerful aristocracy of obscene wealth increasingly in control of our government and fiat money supply. Could it be that an unconstitutional hybrid government with police powers is slowly asserting clandestine authority in all sectors of the federal government, social and business communities?  At the same time, placing themselves and their calculated enterprise above our laws, our national sovereignty, and public good? This is a recipe for disaster, calamity, collapse, and intensified domestic and international conflict. Why do our borders, language, culture, and standard of living, appear to be in such mortal danger by anyone who wishes to do us harm? Is it all part of a “shadow government” assault aimed at the decimation of a woefully distracted middle class. As long as we have an enemy or political foe it keeps the public attention off “them” and “they” just keep making money weather or not we win or lose. What we have here is a traitor; an enemy of our own making within. Add that to the Islamic Fascism assault and we have a serious problem that, if we are to save ourselves, only the dwindling middle class can solve.  

The sharks smell our blood. Could it be, just a matter of time before America becomes the prey or chum for some other ruthless economic and military empire? What will the rest of the world do without America and the years of protection and treasure we have expended on their behalf? What will you do? What will your children and their children inherit; a country that is or one that isn’t? We are, “Living on a Thin Line.” 

“…There’s no England now…What are we supposed to do…This is Captain America calling…I’m falling…”

kinks1-copy.jpg

“America Alone: The End Of The World As We Know It” by Mark Steyn

Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis” by Bat Ye’or

The Savage Nation: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Borders, Language and Culture by Michael Savage

Glenn Beck: Muslim Violence Destroys France and England

Londonistan & Academia: Home Grown Islamofascists

Double Standards in Londonistan

January 2, 2007 Posted by | America, Islamo Fascism | 1 Comment